Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs LRSCX
DFFVX vs LRSCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs LRSCX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$36.48
Change+$0.39 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.76B
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value A
Price$15.22
Change+$0.14 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets370.65M
DFFVX vs LRSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. LRSCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a StrongBuy and LRSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.8B vs. LRSCX (371M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than LRSCX: DFFVX (1.50) vs LRSCX (0.02). DFFVX was incepted earlier than LRSCX: DFFVX (26 years) vs LRSCX (30 years). LRSCX (1.21) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). LRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than LRSCX: DFFVX (0) vs LRSCX (1000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. LRSCX (-8.13). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 119.45 vs. LRSCX (36.23).
| DFFVX | LRSCX | DFFVX / LRSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.21 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.21 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.117 | -0.327 | -2,173% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.8B | 371M | 3,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.02 | 7,744% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | -8.13 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.44 | 31.28 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 119.45 | 36.23 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.57 | -37.67 | -248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement