Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$32.46
Change-$0.54 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.56B
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$23.53
Change-$0.74 (-3.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.22M
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. FTMSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Hold and FTMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. FTMSX (19.2M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: DFFVX (1.62) vs FTMSX (0.14). DFFVX was incepted earlier than FTMSX: DFFVX (25 years) vs FTMSX (6 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTMSX: DFFVX (0) vs FTMSX (100000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.74 vs. FTMSX (-6.55). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 98.41 vs. FTMSX (48.26).
| DFFVX | FTMSX | DFFVX / FTMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.33 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.144 | -12.398 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 19.2M | 65,625% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.14 | 1,126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.74 | -6.55 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.80 | -6.51 | -366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.41 | 48.26 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers