Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$35.21
Change+$0.14 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.32B
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$27.68
Change-$0.36 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.75M
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. FTMSX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Hold and FTMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. FTMSX (21.8M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: DFFVX (1.68) vs FTMSX (0.12). DFFVX was incepted earlier than FTMSX: DFFVX (26 years) vs FTMSX (7 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTMSX: DFFVX (0) vs FTMSX (100000). FTMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.77 vs. DFFVX (2.47). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 91.09 vs. FTMSX (41.57).
| DFFVX | FTMSX | DFFVX / FTMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.33 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.910 | 3.053 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.3B | 21.8M | 61,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 0.12 | 1,409% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.47 | 10.77 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.38 | 20.66 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.09 | 41.57 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.97 | N/A | - |