Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$35.13
Change+$0.06 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$25.82
Change-$0.30 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.82M
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. FTMSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and FTMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. FTMSX (20.8M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: DFFVX (1.62) vs FTMSX (0.13). DFFVX was incepted earlier than FTMSX: DFFVX (26 years) vs FTMSX (7 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTMSX: DFFVX (0) vs FTMSX (100000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. FTMSX (2.18). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 98.01 vs. FTMSX (37.22).
| DFFVX | FTMSX | DFFVX / FTMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.33 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.153 | -3.872 | -81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 20.8M | 64,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.13 | 1,209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 2.18 | 317% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.16 | -5.20 | -445% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.01 | 37.22 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement