Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs FTMSX
DFA US Targeted Value I
Price$37.61
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.08B
FullerThaler Behvrl Mcr-Cp Eq Instl
Price$27.30
Change-$0.19 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.46M
DFFVX vs FTMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. FTMSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and FTMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 14.1B vs. FTMSX (21.5M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than FTMSX: DFFVX (1.65) vs FTMSX (0.12). DFFVX was incepted earlier than FTMSX: DFFVX (26 years) vs FTMSX (7 years). FTMSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). FTMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.00 vs. DFFVX (7.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTMSX: DFFVX (0) vs FTMSX (100000). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.25 vs. FTMSX (2.76). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 69.65 vs. FTMSX (3.11).
| DFFVX | FTMSX | DFFVX / FTMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.33 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.69 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.992 | 1.638 | 671% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 21.5M | 65,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.12 | 1,336% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.25 | 2.76 | 372% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.33 | 21.16 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.65 | 3.11 | 2,241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers