Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs XMVM
DFAT vs XMVM Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs XMVM
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$52.54
Change-$0.80 (-1.50%)
Volume$192.96K
Net Assets10.67B
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momt ETF
Price$53.79
Change-$1.00 (-1.83%)
Volume$34.25K
Net Assets256.49M
DFAT vs XMVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. XMVM commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and XMVM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.7B vs. XMVM (256M). XMVM has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: XMVM (-2.232) vs DFAT (-5.319). DFAT was incepted earlier than XMVM: DFAT (27 years) vs XMVM (20 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than XMVM (0.39). XMVM has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | XMVM | DFAT / XMVM | |
| Gain YTD | -5.319 | -2.232 | 238% |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 256M | 4,180% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.39 | 72% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 82.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.88 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 24 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
XMVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMVM has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMVM jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMVM | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| WTFC - XMVM | 89% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| FNB - XMVM | 89% Closely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| PNFP - XMVM | 89% Closely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| UMBF - XMVM | 88% Closely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| ONB - XMVM | 88% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||