Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs SMLV
DFAT vs SMLV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMLV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$56.35
Change+$0.25 (+0.45%)
Volume$197.2K
Net Assets11.15B
SPDR® SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatil ETF
Price$129.56
Change+$1.02 (+0.79%)
Volume$2.99K
Net Assets207.53M
DFAT vs SMLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMLV commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and SMLV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.2B vs. SMLV (208M). SMLV has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: SMLV (2.907) vs DFAT (2.015). DFAT was incepted earlier than SMLV: DFAT (27 years) vs SMLV (12 years). SMLV (0.12) has a lower expense ratio than DFAT (0.28). SMLV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | SMLV | DFAT / SMLV | |
| Gain YTD | 2.015 | 2.907 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 208M | 5,385% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.12 | 233% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 56.00 | 16% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 2.92 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 84% | 24 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +1.99% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
SMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMLV has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMLV jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMLV | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| FMBH - SMLV | 90% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| MCBS - SMLV | 88% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| SPFI - SMLV | 87% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| OBK - SMLV | 87% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| NIC - SMLV | 86% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||