Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs SMLV
DFAT vs SMLV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMLV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$60.55
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
Volume$195.65K
Net Assets12.18B
State Street® SPDR® USSmCapLowVolIndETF
Price$133.29
Change+$0.32 (+0.24%)
Volume$7.14K
Net Assets202.49M
DFAT vs SMLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMLV commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and SMLV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 12.2B vs. SMLV (202M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than SMLV: DFAT (10.136) vs SMLV (6.572). DFAT was incepted earlier than SMLV: DFAT (27 years) vs SMLV (13 years). SMLV (0.12) has a lower expense ratio than DFAT (0.28). SMLV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | SMLV | DFAT / SMLV | |
| Gain YTD | 10.136 | 6.572 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 202M | 6,040% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.12 | 233% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 48.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 2.77 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
SMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMLV has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMLV jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMLV | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| FNB - SMLV | 81% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| ASB - SMLV | 81% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BHRB - SMLV | 81% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| FMBH - SMLV | 80% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MCBS - SMLV | 78% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||