Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs SMDV
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMDV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$52.54
Change-$0.80 (-1.50%)
Volume$192.96K
Net Assets10.35B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$63.84
Change-$1.26 (-1.94%)
Volume$23.08K
Net Assets642.2M
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMDV commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and SMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.4B vs. SMDV (642M). SMDV (-5.101) and DFAT (-5.319) have matching annual dividend yield . DFAT was incepted earlier than SMDV: DFAT (27 years) vs SMDV (10 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than SMDV (0.40). SMDV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | SMDV | DFAT / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | -5.319 | -5.101 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 642M | 1,620% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.40 | 70% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 44.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 2.94 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | -1.94% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| HFWA - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| CBU - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| NBTB - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| WSBC - SMDV | 85% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||