Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs SMDV
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMDV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$59.29
Change+$0.14 (+0.24%)
Volume$568.37K
Net Assets11.81B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$68.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
Volume$10.35K
Net Assets667.3M
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMDV commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a StrongBuy and SMDV is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.8B vs. SMDV (667M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than SMDV: DFAT (7.337) vs SMDV (2.851). DFAT was incepted earlier than SMDV: DFAT (27 years) vs SMDV (11 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than SMDV (0.40). SMDV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | SMDV | DFAT / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 7.337 | 2.851 | 257% |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 667M | 1,769% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.40 | 70% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 44.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 2.55 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +8.27% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| UBSI - SMDV | 89% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| STBA - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| AUB - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| FULT - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
More | ||||