Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs SMDV
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs SMDV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$56.93
Change-$0.19 (-0.33%)
Volume$3.52K
Net Assets11.4B
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
Price$65.28
Change-$0.26 (-0.40%)
Volume$427
Net Assets619.83M
DFAT vs SMDV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. SMDV commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and SMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.4B vs. SMDV (620M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than SMDV: DFAT (3.897) vs SMDV (-1.366). DFAT was incepted earlier than SMDV: DFAT (27 years) vs SMDV (11 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than SMDV (0.40). SMDV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | SMDV | DFAT / SMDV | |
| Gain YTD | 3.897 | -1.366 | -285% |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 620M | 1,839% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.40 | 70% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 38.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 1.57 | 2.69 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.72% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.71% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
More | ||||
SMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMDV has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMDV jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMDV | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| STBA - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| UBSI - SMDV | 87% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| UCB - SMDV | 86% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| NBTB - SMDV | 85% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| HFWA - SMDV | 85% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||