Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs MDYV
DFAT vs MDYV Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs MDYV
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$64.56
Change+$6.94 (+12.04%)
Volume$538.58K
Net Assets13.04B
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md CpValETF
Price$89.08
Change+$5.97 (+7.18%)
Volume$104.68K
Net Assets2.52B
DFAT vs MDYV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. MDYV commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and MDYV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 13B vs. MDYV (2.52B). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYV: DFAT (8.431) vs MDYV (5.233). DFAT was incepted earlier than MDYV: DFAT (27 years) vs MDYV (20 years). MDYV (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than DFAT (0.28). MDYV has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | MDYV | DFAT / MDYV | |
| Gain YTD | 8.431 | 5.233 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 13B | 2.52B | 517% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.15 | 187% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 37.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 1.46 | 1.65 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||
MDYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYV has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYV jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYV | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| WTFC - MDYV | 85% Closely correlated | +4.23% | ||
| FNB - MDYV | 85% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| BDC - MDYV | 84% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| SF - MDYV | 83% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| HWC - MDYV | 83% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
More | ||||