Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs EZM
DFAT vs EZM Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs EZM
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$56.05
Change+$0.15 (+0.27%)
Volume$225.46K
Net Assets11.11B
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings ETF
Price$63.93
Change+$0.36 (+0.57%)
Volume$9.14K
Net Assets793.47M
DFAT vs EZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. EZM commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and EZM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.1B vs. EZM (793M). EZM has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAT: EZM (3.007) vs DFAT (1.472). DFAT was incepted earlier than EZM: DFAT (27 years) vs EZM (18 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than EZM (0.38). EZM has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | EZM | DFAT / EZM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.472 | 3.007 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 793M | 1,400% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.38 | 74% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 40.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.34 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | EZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.86% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
EZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZM has been closely correlated with EWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EZM jumps, then EWBC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EZM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EZM | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| EWBC - EZM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| ALLY - EZM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| TOL - EZM | 69% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| AN - EZM | 66% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| AGCO - EZM | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
More | ||||