Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs ECML
DFAT vs ECML Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs ECML
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$58.57
Change+$0.62 (+1.07%)
Volume$370.03K
Net Assets11.72B
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Price$33.16
Change+$0.30 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets129.98M
DFAT vs ECML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. ECML commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Hold and ECML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 11.7B vs. ECML (130M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than ECML: DFAT (6.465) vs ECML (4.620). DFAT was incepted earlier than ECML: DFAT (27 years) vs ECML (2 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than ECML (0.95). ECML has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | ECML | DFAT / ECML | |
| Gain YTD | 6.465 | 4.620 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 130M | 9,000% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.95 | 29% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 30.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 0.93 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | ECML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +1.00% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
More | ||||
ECML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECML has been closely correlated with TPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECML jumps, then TPH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| TPH - ECML | 75% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| TEX - ECML | 69% Closely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| BCC - ECML | 67% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| NVR - ECML | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| AN - ECML | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||