Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAT vs ECML
DFAT vs ECML Comparison
Open Charts DFAT vs ECML
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Price$53.97
Change+$0.15 (+0.28%)
Volume$216.5K
Net Assets10.67B
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
Price$30.67
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
Volume$320
Net Assets145.64M
DFAT vs ECML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAT vs. ECML commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAT is a Buy and ECML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAT has more net assets: 10.7B vs. ECML (146M). DFAT has a higher annual dividend yield than ECML: DFAT (-2.294) vs ECML (-3.222). DFAT was incepted earlier than ECML: DFAT (27 years) vs ECML (2 years). DFAT (0.28) has a lower expense ratio than ECML (0.95). ECML has a higher turnover DFAT (9.00) vs DFAT (9.00).
| DFAT | ECML | DFAT / ECML | |
| Gain YTD | -2.294 | -3.222 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 146M | 7,329% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.28 | 0.95 | 29% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 23.00 | 39% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.02 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAT | ECML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAT has been closely correlated with ALLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAT jumps, then ALLY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAT | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| ALLY - DFAT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| TOL - DFAT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| AGCO - DFAT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| CLF - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | +5.40% | ||
| ARW - DFAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
ECML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECML has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECML jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECML | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCC - ECML | 77% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TPH - ECML | 75% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| AN - ECML | 72% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| TEX - ECML | 69% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| MHO - ECML | 69% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||