Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAS vs XSHQ
DFAS vs XSHQ Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs XSHQ
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$67.55
Change-$0.10 (-0.15%)
Volume$338.97K
Net Assets11.33B
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Price$42.28
Change+$0.20 (+0.48%)
Volume$17.79K
Net Assets278.77M
DFAS vs XSHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. XSHQ commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and XSHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 11.3B vs. XSHQ (279M). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than XSHQ: DFAS (4.586) vs XSHQ (0.773). DFAS was incepted earlier than XSHQ: DFAS (27 years) vs XSHQ (9 years). DFAS (0.27) has a lower expense ratio than XSHQ (0.29). XSHQ has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | XSHQ | DFAS / XSHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 4.586 | 0.773 | 593% |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 279M | 4,050% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.29 | 93% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 86.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 1.18 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||
XSHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSHQ has been closely correlated with AX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSHQ jumps, then AX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XSHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSHQ | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| AX - XSHQ | 82% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| APAM - XSHQ | 82% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| CATY - XSHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| NPO - XSHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| FELE - XSHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||