Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAS vs XSHQ
DFAS vs XSHQ Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs XSHQ
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$73.94
Change+$0.40 (+0.54%)
Volume$486.46K
Net Assets12.78B
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Price$43.78
Change+$0.24 (+0.55%)
Volume$14.04K
Net Assets252.84M
DFAS vs XSHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. XSHQ commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and XSHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 12.8B vs. XSHQ (253M). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than XSHQ: DFAS (6.129) vs XSHQ (4.015). DFAS was incepted earlier than XSHQ: DFAS (27 years) vs XSHQ (9 years). DFAS (0.27) has a lower expense ratio than XSHQ (0.29). XSHQ has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | XSHQ | DFAS / XSHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 6.129 | 4.015 | 153% |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 253M | 5,059% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.29 | 93% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 69.00 | 12% |
| Yield | 0.99 | 1.48 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
XSHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSHQ has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSHQ jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XSHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSHQ | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| APAM - XSHQ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| AX - XSHQ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CATY - XSHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| NPO - XSHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| FELE - XSHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||