Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAS vs XMLV
DFAS vs XMLV Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs XMLV
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$74.77
Change+$0.83 (+1.12%)
Volume$429.18K
Net Assets12.98B
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Price$64.49
Change+$0.40 (+0.62%)
Volume$32.05K
Net Assets762.91M
DFAS vs XMLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. XMLV commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and XMLV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 13B vs. XMLV (763M). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than XMLV: DFAS (7.320) vs XMLV (3.403). DFAS was incepted earlier than XMLV: DFAS (27 years) vs XMLV (13 years). XMLV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than DFAS (0.27). XMLV has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | XMLV | DFAS / XMLV | |
| Gain YTD | 7.320 | 3.403 | 215% |
| Net Assets | 13B | 763M | 1,704% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.25 | 108% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 58.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.99 | 2.87 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||
XMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMLV has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMLV jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMLV | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| GGG - XMLV | 78% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| STAG - XMLV | 77% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| MTG - XMLV | 76% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| PRI - XMLV | 76% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| IRT - XMLV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||