DFAS | XJR | DFAS / XJR | |
Gain YTD | 4.586 | 2.394 | 192% |
Net Assets | 11.3B | 103M | 10,971% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.12 | 225% |
Turnover | 8.00 | 27.00 | 30% |
Yield | 0.98 | 1.75 | 56% |
Fund Existence | 27 years | 5 years | - |
DFAS | XJR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 9 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS | 100% | -0.15% | ||
UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that XJR and BCC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XJR and BCC's prices will move in lockstep.