Ad is loading...
DFAS vs VTWO
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs VTWO
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$65.43
Change+$0.91 (+1.41%)
Volume$401.88K
Net Assets9.38B
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Price$88.88
Change+$1.04 (+1.18%)
Volume$1.76M
Net Assets12.76B
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. VTWO commentary
Jan 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a StrongBuy and VTWO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTWO has more net assets: 12.8B vs. DFAS (9.38B). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than VTWO: DFAS (0.538) vs VTWO (-0.504). DFAS was incepted earlier than VTWO: DFAS (26 years) vs VTWO (14 years). VTWO has a higher turnover DFAS (4.00) vs DFAS (4.00).
| DFAS | VTWO | DFAS / VTWO | |
| Gain YTD | 0.538 | -0.504 | -107% |
| Net Assets | 9.38B | 12.8B | 73% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 15.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 1.33 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +1.41% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +7.11% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||
VTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VTWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWO | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| SSD - VTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| LNW - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| FIX - VTWO | 45% Loosely correlated | +6.21% | ||
| FN - VTWO | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| SMCI - VTWO | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||