Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAS vs VTWO
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs VTWO
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$62.62
Change+$0.75 (+1.21%)
Volume$454.93K
Net Assets9.88B
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Price$85.63
Change+$1.36 (+1.61%)
Volume$1.03M
Net Assets12.39B
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. VTWO commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and VTWO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTWO has more net assets: 12.4B vs. DFAS (9.88B). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than VTWO: DFAS (-5.391) vs VTWO (-6.963). DFAS was incepted earlier than VTWO: DFAS (27 years) vs VTWO (15 years). VTWO (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than DFAS (0.27). VTWO has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | VTWO | DFAS / VTWO | |
| Gain YTD | -5.391 | -6.963 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 9.88B | 12.4B | 80% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.07 | 386% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 12.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 1.05 | 1.39 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | 24 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 85% | about 1 month ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 12 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | -4.91% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.99% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
VTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VTWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWO | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| SSD - VTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| LNW - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| FIX - VTWO | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| ONTO - VTWO | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| FN - VTWO | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
More | ||||