Ad is loading...
DFAS vs VTWO
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs VTWO
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$64.35
Change-$1.77 (-2.68%)
Volume$436.51K
Net Assets9.65B
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Price$88.08
Change-$2.65 (-2.92%)
Volume$1.43M
Net Assets12.25B
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. VTWO commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and VTWO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTWO has more net assets: 12.3B vs. DFAS (9.65B). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than VTWO: DFAS (-1.122) vs VTWO (-1.399). DFAS was incepted earlier than VTWO: DFAS (26 years) vs VTWO (14 years). VTWO has a higher turnover DFAS (4.00) vs DFAS (4.00).
| DFAS | VTWO | DFAS / VTWO | |
| Gain YTD | -1.122 | -1.399 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 9.65B | 12.3B | 78% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 15.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 1.33 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 19 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | -2.68% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.86% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
More | ||||
VTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VTWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWO | 100% | -2.92% | ||
| SSD - VTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| LNW - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| FIX - VTWO | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| FN - VTWO | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.80% | ||
| SMCI - VTWO | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.40% | ||
More | ||||