Ad is loading...
DFAS vs VTWO
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs VTWO
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$55.67
Change+$0.53 (+0.96%)
Volume$755.42K
Net Assets8.62B
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Price$75.38
Change+$0.69 (+0.92%)
Volume$1.28M
Net Assets11.28B
DFAS vs VTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. VTWO commentary
Apr 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and VTWO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTWO has more net assets: 11.3B vs. DFAS (8.62B). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than VTWO: DFAS (-14.276) vs VTWO (-15.555). DFAS was incepted earlier than VTWO: DFAS (26 years) vs VTWO (15 years). VTWO (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than DFAS (0.27). VTWO has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | VTWO | DFAS / VTWO | |
| Gain YTD | -14.276 | -15.555 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 8.62B | 11.3B | 76% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.07 | 386% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 12.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 1.07 | 1.43 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
VTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTWO has been loosely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VTWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWO | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| SSD - VTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| LNW - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| FIX - VTWO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ONTO - VTWO | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| FN - VTWO | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
More | ||||