Ad is loading...
DFAS vs SMMD
DFAS vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs SMMD
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$62.48
Change+$0.20 (+0.32%)
Volume$1.9K
Net Assets9.9B
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$65.86
Change+$0.18 (+0.27%)
Volume$533
Net Assets1.47B
DFAS vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. SMMD commentary
May 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Buy and SMMD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 9.9B vs. SMMD (1.47B). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAS: SMMD (-3.122) vs DFAS (-4.113). DFAS was incepted earlier than SMMD: DFAS (26 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than DFAS (0.27). SMMD has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | SMMD | DFAS / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -4.113 | -3.122 | 132% |
| Net Assets | 9.9B | 1.47B | 674% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.15 | 180% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 9.00 | 89% |
| Yield | 1.11 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | -4.68% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||