Ad is loading...
DFAS vs SMMD
DFAS vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs SMMD
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$55.67
Change+$0.53 (+0.96%)
Volume$755.42K
Net Assets8.62B
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$58.73
Change+$0.44 (+0.75%)
Volume$740.49K
Net Assets1.21B
DFAS vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. SMMD commentary
Apr 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 8.62B vs. SMMD (1.21B). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than DFAS: SMMD (-13.373) vs DFAS (-14.276). DFAS was incepted earlier than SMMD: DFAS (26 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than DFAS (0.27). SMMD has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | SMMD | DFAS / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -14.276 | -13.373 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 8.62B | 1.21B | 710% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.15 | 180% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 9.00 | 89% |
| Yield | 1.07 | 1.42 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||