Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAS vs QVMS
DFAS vs QVMS Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs QVMS
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$71.02
Change-$0.22 (-0.31%)
Volume$3.37K
Net Assets12.31B
Invesco S&P SmallCp 600 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
Price$28.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
Volume$254
Net Assets212.12M
DFAS vs QVMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. QVMS commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and QVMS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 12.3B vs. QVMS (212M). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than QVMS: DFAS (10.299) vs QVMS (7.932). DFAS was incepted earlier than QVMS: DFAS (27 years) vs QVMS (4 years). QVMS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than DFAS (0.27). QVMS has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | QVMS | DFAS / QVMS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.299 | 7.932 | 130% |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 212M | 5,802% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.15 | 180% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 35.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 1.30 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
QVMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMS has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVMS | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| BCC - QVMS | 70% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| IBP - QVMS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MTH - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| MLI - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| ATI - QVMS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||