Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAS vs QSML
DFAS vs QSML Comparison
Open Charts DFAS vs QSML
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF
Price$74.76
Change+$0.57 (+0.77%)
Volume$1.09K
Net Assets13B
WisdomTree U.S. Small Cap Quality Gr
Price$29.24
Change-$0.43 (-1.45%)
Volume$500
Net Assets10.39M
DFAS vs QSML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAS vs. QSML commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAS is a Hold and QSML is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFAS has more net assets: 13B vs. QSML (10.4M). DFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than QSML: DFAS (6.488) vs QSML (2.063). DFAS was incepted earlier than QSML: DFAS (27 years) vs QSML (2 years). DFAS (0.27) has a lower expense ratio than QSML (0.38). QSML has a higher turnover DFAS (8.00) vs DFAS (8.00).
| DFAS | QSML | DFAS / QSML | |
| Gain YTD | 6.488 | 2.063 | 315% |
| Net Assets | 13B | 10.4M | 125,000% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.38 | 71% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 74.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 0.61 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAS | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | +5.71% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
QSML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSML has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QSML jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QSML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QSML | 100% | N/A | ||
| BDC - QSML | 66% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| ACA - QSML | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| HGV - QSML | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| TEX - QSML | 62% Loosely correlated | +7.09% | ||
| ENVA - QSML | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.72% | ||
More | ||||