| DFAE | EEMV | DFAE / EEMV | |
| Gain YTD | 30.998 | 12.451 | 249% |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 3.79B | 193% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.26 | 135% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 32.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 2.07 | 3.29 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| DFAE | EEMV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JPIB | 49.01 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| JPMorgan International Bond Opps ETF | |||
| MYCM | 24.92 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR SSGA My2033 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| DECM | 32.88 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec | |||
| IQM | 89.39 | -0.32 | -0.36% |
| Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | |||
| OIA | 5.97 | -0.05 | -0.83% |
| INVESCO Municipal Income OPPORTUNITIES TRUST | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAE has been closely correlated with KC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAE jumps, then KC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAE | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| KC - DFAE | 67% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| DD - DFAE | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| VALE - DFAE | 67% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| BABA - DFAE | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| BSAC - DFAE | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMV has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMV jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| LTM - EEMV | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TEL - EEMV | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ZTO - EEMV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| PDD - EEMV | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| BAP - EEMV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||