Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMZX vs RNWBX
DEMZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMZX vs RNWBX
Nomura Emerging Markets R6
Price$35.18
Change+$0.15 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.14B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
DEMZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMZX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. DEMZX (8.14B). DEMZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMZX (1.23) vs RNWBX (0.12). DEMZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMZX (10 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than DEMZX (1.24). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMZX (14.00). DEMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: DEMZX (0) vs RNWBX (250). DEMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 68.08 vs. RNWBX (18.78). DEMZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. RNWBX (14.40).
| DEMZX | RNWBX | DEMZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 70.039 | 24.772 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.14B | 75.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.12 | 1,044% |
| Returns for 1 year | 68.08 | 18.78 | 362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.13 | 40.66 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.21 | 14.40 | 363% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers