Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Nomura Emerging Markets C
Price$30.63
Change+$0.14 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$95.66
Change-$0.26 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. DEMCX (8.89B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMCX (16.52) vs RNWHX (1.33). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (30 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 90.60 vs. RNWHX (28.86). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.97 vs. RNWHX (13.21).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.926 | 4.057 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.89B | 75.5B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 16.52 | 1.33 | 1,246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 90.60 | 28.86 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.51 | 42.44 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.97 | 13.21 | 409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.77 | 121.60 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement