Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$23.96
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$90.03
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. DEMCX (6.44B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWHX (1.00) vs DEMCX (0.86). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. RNWHX (14.05). RNWHX (27.62) and DEMCX (26.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.817 | 18.429 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 71.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.00 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 14.05 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.34 | 32.70 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.49 | 27.62 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers