Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Nomura Emerging Markets C
Price$34.75
Change+$5.57 (+19.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.95B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. DEMCX (9.95B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMCX (13.28) vs RNWHX (1.25). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (30 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 113.09 vs. RNWHX (27.68). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 69.50 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.578 | 6.092 | 387% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.95B | 75.5B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.28 | 1.25 | 1,058% |
| Returns for 1 year | 113.09 | 27.68 | 408% |
| Returns for 3 years | 145.47 | 43.24 | 336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.50 | 11.69 | 595% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.84 | 124.21 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers