Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$22.33
Change-$0.27 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. DEMCX (6.06B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWHX (1.04) vs DEMCX (0.98). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.06 vs. RNWHX (8.20). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. RNWHX (33.47).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.054 | 11.773 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 67.7B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.04 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.06 | 8.20 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.31 | 35.09 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.47 | 33.47 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers