Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$29.92
Change+$0.27 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. DEMCX (7.96B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWHX (0.93) vs DEMCX (0.74). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.55 vs. RNWHX (15.38). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.26 vs. RNWHX (29.08).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.860 | 24.375 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 74.7B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.55 | 15.38 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.13 | 57.29 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.26 | 29.08 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers