Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$23.79
Change-$0.14 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.41B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.02
Change-$0.41 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. DEMCX (6.41B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWHX (0.99) vs DEMCX (0.84). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.59 vs. RNWHX (16.04). RNWHX (29.58) and DEMCX (28.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.903 | 17.101 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.41B | 70.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.99 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.59 | 16.04 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.37 | 40.30 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.87 | 29.58 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers