Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWHX
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$32.11
Change-$0.75 (-2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.4B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
DEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. DEMCX (8.4B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWHX (0.90) vs DEMCX (0.64). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 68.03 vs. RNWHX (20.99). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.92 vs. RNWHX (24.39).
| DEMCX | RNWHX | DEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.72 | 301% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.72 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 72.634 | 26.572 | 273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.4B | 76.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 68.03 | 20.99 | 324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.11 | 48.72 | 234% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.92 | 24.39 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers