Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWFX
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$23.79
Change-$0.14 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.41B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.52
Change-$0.42 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. DEMCX (6.41B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWFX (1.04) vs DEMCX (0.84). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.59 vs. RNWFX (16.21). RNWFX (30.24) and DEMCX (28.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DEMCX | RNWFX | DEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.62 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.62 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.903 | 17.163 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.41B | 70.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.04 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.59 | 16.21 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.37 | 40.68 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.87 | 30.24 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.53 | 74.70 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers