Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWFX
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWFX
Nomura Emerging Markets C
Price$25.66
Change-$5.94 (-18.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.61
Change-$0.28 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. DEMCX (8.1B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWFX (0.95) vs DEMCX (0.65). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMCX (30 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.56 vs. RNWFX (18.85). RNWFX (16.78) and DEMCX (16.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DEMCX | RNWFX | DEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.62 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.62 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.957 | 26.340 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.1B | 75.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.95 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.56 | 18.85 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.90 | 51.26 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.67 | 16.78 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.99 | 103.02 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers