Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWFX
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$23.96
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
American Funds New World R5
Price$91.55
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
DEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. DEMCX (6.44B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: RNWFX (1.04) vs DEMCX (0.86). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. RNWFX (14.21). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.26 vs. DEMCX (26.49).
| DEMCX | RNWFX | DEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.62 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.62 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.817 | 18.496 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 71.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.04 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 14.21 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.34 | 33.07 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.49 | 28.26 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.15 | 80.61 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers