Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWBX
DEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWBX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$24.18
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.54B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
DEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. DEMCX (6.54B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMCX (0.84) vs RNWBX (0.13). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.44 vs. RNWBX (10.50). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.94 vs. RNWBX (27.64).
| DEMCX | RNWBX | DEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.67 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.000 | 15.935 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.54B | 70.6B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.13 | 654% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.44 | 10.50 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.90 | 37.23 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.94 | 27.64 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.96 | 63.65 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers