Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWBX
DEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWBX
Nomura Emerging Markets C
Price$30.63
Change+$0.14 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.29
Change-$0.25 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
DEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. DEMCX (8.89B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMCX (16.52) vs RNWBX (0.48). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMCX (30 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 90.60 vs. RNWBX (27.43). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.97 vs. RNWBX (8.49).
| DEMCX | RNWBX | DEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.67 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.67 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.926 | 4.012 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.89B | 75.5B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 16.52 | 0.48 | 3,471% |
| Returns for 1 year | 90.60 | 27.43 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.51 | 38.02 | 309% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.97 | 8.49 | 636% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.77 | 111.70 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers