Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWAX
DEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWAX
Nomura Emerging Markets C
Price$25.66
Change-$5.94 (-18.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
American Funds New World R1
Price$92.12
Change-$0.27 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
DEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Dec 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. DEMCX (8.1B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: DEMCX (0.65) vs RNWAX (0.00). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: DEMCX (30 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWAX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.56 vs. RNWAX (17.49). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.67 vs. RNWAX (11.89).
| DEMCX | RNWAX | DEMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.66 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.66 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.957 | 25.112 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.1B | 75.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.56 | 17.49 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.90 | 46.36 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.67 | 11.89 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.99 | 93.56 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers