Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs RNWAX
DEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs RNWAX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$29.92
Change+$0.27 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
American Funds New World R1
Price$90.90
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
DEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. DEMCX (7.96B). DEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: DEMCX (0.74) vs RNWAX (0.00). DEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: DEMCX (29 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMCX: RNWAX (250) vs DEMCX (1000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.55 vs. RNWAX (14.21). DEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.26 vs. RNWAX (24.27).
| DEMCX | RNWAX | DEMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.66 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.66 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 60.860 | 23.455 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 74.7B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.55 | 14.21 | 335% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.13 | 54.12 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.26 | 24.27 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.18 | 85.80 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers