Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMCX vs FNWFX
DEMCX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMCX vs FNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
Price$23.96
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
American Funds New World F3
Price$91.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
DEMCX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMCX vs. FNWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMCX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. DEMCX (6.44B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than DEMCX: FNWFX (1.10) vs DEMCX (0.86). DEMCX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DEMCX (29 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). DEMCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMCX (14.00). DEMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DEMCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). DEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. FNWFX (14.25). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.41 vs. DEMCX (26.49).
| DEMCX | FNWFX | DEMCX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.57 | 381% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 0.57 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.817 | 18.528 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 71.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.10 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 14.25 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.34 | 33.16 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.49 | 28.41 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers