Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$26.43
Change+$0.31 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.82
Change+$0.19 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. DEMAX (6.45B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (1.36) vs RNWHX (0.97). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.76 vs. RNWHX (15.26). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.54 vs. RNWHX (26.08).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.712 | 19.021 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 71.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.97 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.76 | 15.26 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.83 | 43.34 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.54 | 26.08 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers