Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$24.36
Change-$0.29 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. DEMAX (6.06B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (1.56) vs RNWHX (1.04). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. RNWHX (8.20). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.43 vs. RNWHX (33.47).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.475 | 11.773 | 174% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 67.7B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.04 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.89 | 8.20 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.14 | 35.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.43 | 33.47 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers