Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWHX
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWHX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$25.98
Change-$0.15 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.41B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.02
Change-$0.41 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
DEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. DEMAX (6.41B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DEMAX (1.33) vs RNWHX (0.99). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.52 vs. RNWHX (16.04). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.69 vs. RNWHX (29.58).
| DEMAX | RNWHX | DEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.72 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.487 | 17.101 | 167% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.41B | 70.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.52 | 16.04 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.43 | 40.30 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 29.58 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers