Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWFX
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$25.98
Change-$0.15 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.41B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.52
Change-$0.42 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. DEMAX (6.41B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: DEMAX (1.33) vs RNWFX (1.04). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.52 vs. RNWFX (16.21). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.69 vs. RNWFX (30.24).
| DEMAX | RNWFX | DEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.62 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.487 | 17.163 | 166% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.41B | 70.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.04 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.52 | 16.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.43 | 40.68 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 30.24 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.45 | 74.70 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement