Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWFX
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$26.43
Change+$0.31 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds New World R5
Price$92.01
Change+$0.67 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. DEMAX (6.45B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: DEMAX (1.36) vs RNWFX (1.01). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.76 vs. RNWFX (15.41). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.54 vs. RNWFX (26.72).
| DEMAX | RNWFX | DEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.62 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.712 | 19.091 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 71.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.01 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.76 | 15.41 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.83 | 43.73 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.54 | 26.72 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.75 | 93.12 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers