Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWFX
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$26.17
Change+$0.11 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
American Funds New World R5
Price$91.55
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
DEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. DEMAX (6.44B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: DEMAX (1.36) vs RNWFX (1.04). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DEMAX (29 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.48 vs. RNWFX (14.21). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.21 vs. RNWFX (28.26).
| DEMAX | RNWFX | DEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.62 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.426 | 18.496 | 159% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 71.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.04 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.48 | 14.21 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.32 | 33.07 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.21 | 28.26 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.72 | 80.61 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers