Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs RNWBX
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs RNWBX
Nomura Emerging Markets A
Price$34.83
Change+$0.15 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.14B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
DEMAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. DEMAX (8.14B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: DEMAX (1.03) vs RNWBX (0.12). DEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DEMAX (30 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) and DEMAX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs DEMAX (1000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.52 vs. RNWBX (18.78). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.52 vs. RNWBX (14.40).
| DEMAX | RNWBX | DEMAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.67 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.67 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 69.486 | 24.772 | 280% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.14B | 75.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.12 | 876% |
| Returns for 1 year | 67.52 | 18.78 | 359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.77 | 40.66 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.52 | 14.40 | 351% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.48 | 87.08 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers