Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEMAX vs FNWFX
DEMAX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DEMAX vs FNWFX
Macquarie Emerging Markets A
Price$26.17
Change+$0.11 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
American Funds New World F3
Price$91.29
Change+$0.19 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
DEMAX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEMAX vs. FNWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEMAX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. DEMAX (6.44B). DEMAX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: DEMAX (1.36) vs FNWFX (1.10). DEMAX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: DEMAX (29 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). DEMAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. DEMAX (14.00). DEMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: DEMAX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). DEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.48 vs. FNWFX (14.25). DEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.21 vs. FNWFX (28.41).
| DEMAX | FNWFX | DEMAX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.57 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.57 | 279% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.426 | 18.528 | 159% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 71.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.10 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.48 | 14.25 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.32 | 33.16 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.21 | 28.41 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers