DEM | EEM | DEM / EEM | |
Gain YTD | 16.597 | 20.572 | 81% |
Net Assets | 3.12B | 19.1B | 16% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.72 | 88% |
Turnover | 52.00 | 13.00 | 400% |
Yield | 4.98 | 2.42 | 206% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 22 years | - |
DEM | EEM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago85% | 5 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 7 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEM has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEM jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEM | 100% | +0.12% | ||
BZ - EEM | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
ATHM - EEM | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
HTHT - EEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
IQ - EEM | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.19% | ||
YUMC - EEM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More |