45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEHP vs UMC
DEHP vs UMC Comparison
Open Charts DEHP vs UMC
Dimensional Em Mkts High Prof ETF
Price$27.34
Change-$0.36 (-1.30%)
Volume$18.07K
Net Assets250.77M
United Microelectronic
Price$8.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.26M
Capitalization19.97B
DEHP vs UMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEHP vs. UMC commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEHP is a Hold and UMC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMC: Fundamental Ratings
UMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEHP | UMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 20 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DEHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEHP has been loosely correlated with VALE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEHP jumps, then VALE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEHP | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| VALE - DEHP | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| UMC - DEHP | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PDD - DEHP | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| VIPS - DEHP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SQM - DEHP | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
More | ||||
UMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMC has been loosely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMC jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC | 100% | N/A | ||
| QCOM - UMC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| KLAC - UMC | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| AMAT - UMC | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| LRCX - UMC | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| ASX - UMC | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||