DEFT
Price
$3.14
Change
+$0.17 (+5.72%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
23.88M
PLSQF
Price
$34.15
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DEFT vs PLSQF

Header iconDEFT vs PLSQF Comparison
Open Charts DEFT vs PLSQFBanner chart's image
DEFI Technologies
Price$3.14
Change+$0.17 (+5.72%)
Volume$3.49M
Capitalization23.88M
Plus500
Price$34.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization1.59B
DEFT vs PLSQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DEFT vs. PLSQF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEFT is a Buy and PLSQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DEFT: $3.14 vs. PLSQF: $34.15)
Brand notoriety: DEFT and PLSQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DEFT: 165% vs. PLSQF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DEFT: $23.88M vs. PLSQF: $1.59B
DEFT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $23.88M. PLSQF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DEFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSQF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • DEFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLSQF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSQF is a better buy in the long-term than DEFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DEFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLSQF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DEFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLSQF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLSQF is a better buy in the short-term than DEFT.

Price Growth

DEFT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.65% price change this week, while PLSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLSQF($1.59B) has a higher market cap than DEFT($23.9M). DEFT YTD gains are higher at: 15.441 vs. PLSQF (8.502). PLSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 495M vs. DEFT (-39.66M). PLSQF has more cash in the bank: 936M vs. DEFT (4.41M). PLSQF has less debt than DEFT: PLSQF (5.6M) vs DEFT (57.1M). PLSQF has higher revenues than DEFT: PLSQF (833M) vs DEFT (-3.71M).
DEFTPLSQFDEFT / PLSQF
Capitalization23.9M1.59B2%
EBITDA-39.66M495M-8%
Gain YTD15.4418.502182%
P/E RatioN/A5.08-
Revenue-3.71M833M-0%
Total Cash4.41M936M0%
Total Debt57.1M5.6M1,020%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DEFT vs PLSQF: Fundamental Ratings
DEFT
PLSQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
444
SMR RATING
1..100
1818
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
226
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSQF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DEFT (88). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DEFT (44). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as DEFT (18). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

DEFT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (50). This means that DEFT’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

DEFT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (26). This means that DEFT’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DEFTPLSQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VYRIX12.760.16
+1.27%
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr R6
PRBLX64.670.66
+1.03%
Parnassus Core Equity Investor
LSSCX22.670.15
+0.67%
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Instl
FOBAX20.680.08
+0.39%
Tributary Balanced Instl
JOHAX26.02-0.10
-0.38%
JOHCM International Select Investor

DEFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEFT has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEFT jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DEFT
1D Price
Change %
DEFT100%
+5.72%
MARA - DEFT
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
CLSK - DEFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
RIOT - DEFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
HIVE - DEFT
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BITF - DEFT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
More

PLSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSQF and OTCM have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSQF and OTCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSQF
1D Price
Change %
PLSQF100%
N/A
OTCM - PLSQF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
SPXCF - PLSQF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
SPXCY - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
TMXXF - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
DEFT - PLSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
+5.72%
More