DEFT
Price
$2.91
Change
-$0.06 (-2.02%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.88M
MQBKY
Price
$138.10
Change
-$2.39 (-1.70%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
45.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DEFT vs MQBKY

Header iconDEFT vs MQBKY Comparison
Open Charts DEFT vs MQBKYBanner chart's image
DEFI Technologies
Price$2.91
Change-$0.06 (-2.02%)
Volume$2.34M
Capitalization23.88M
Macquarie Group
Price$138.10
Change-$2.39 (-1.70%)
Volume$13.3K
Capitalization45.69B
DEFT vs MQBKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
DEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DEFT vs. MQBKY commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEFT is a Hold and MQBKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (DEFT: $2.91 vs. MQBKY: $138.10)
Brand notoriety: DEFT and MQBKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DEFT: 144% vs. MQBKY: 53%
Market capitalization -- DEFT: $23.88M vs. MQBKY: $45.69B
DEFT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $23.88M. MQBKY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $45.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DEFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMQBKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DEFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MQBKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MQBKY is a better buy in the long-term than DEFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DEFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQBKY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DEFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MQBKY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DEFT is a better buy in the short-term than MQBKY.

Price Growth

DEFT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -13.13% price change this week, while MQBKY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.41% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQBKY($45.7B) has a higher market cap than DEFT($23.9M). DEFT YTD gains are higher at: 6.985 vs. MQBKY (2.947). MQBKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. DEFT (-39.66M). MQBKY has more cash in the bank: 87.8B vs. DEFT (4.41M). DEFT has less debt than MQBKY: DEFT (57.1M) vs MQBKY (245B). MQBKY has higher revenues than DEFT: MQBKY (6.56B) vs DEFT (-3.71M).
DEFTMQBKYDEFT / MQBKY
Capitalization23.9M45.7B0%
EBITDA-39.66M14.8B-0%
Gain YTD6.9852.947237%
P/E RatioN/A13.26-
Revenue-3.71M6.56B-0%
Total Cash4.41M87.8B0%
Total Debt57.1M245B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DEFT vs MQBKY: Fundamental Ratings
DEFT
MQBKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4631
SMR RATING
1..100
188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
249
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MQBKY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DEFT (88). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as DEFT (46). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DEFT (18). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

DEFT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (50). This means that DEFT’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

DEFT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MQBKY (49). This means that DEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DEFTMQBKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMILX10.71-0.06
-0.56%
Putnam Multi-Asset Income R5
LDFVX15.31-0.15
-0.97%
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
FIOOX16.78-0.17
-1.00%
Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index
USMIX19.61-0.35
-1.75%
Victory Extended Market Index
LZSCX10.69-0.22
-2.02%
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Instl

DEFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEFT has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEFT jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DEFT
1D Price
Change %
DEFT100%
-2.02%
BITF - DEFT
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
CLSK - DEFT
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.22%
MARA - DEFT
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.93%
RIOT - DEFT
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.80%
BTBT - DEFT
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.23%
More

MQBKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MQBKY and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MQBKY and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQBKY
1D Price
Change %
MQBKY100%
-1.70%
JPXGY - MQBKY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
CCORF - MQBKY
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
DEFT - MQBKY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
DBOEY - MQBKY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
LDNXF - MQBKY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More