DEFT
Price
$2.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 29, 04:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
819.08M
HUT
Price
$35.31
Change
+$2.15 (+6.48%)
Updated
Sep 29, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DEFT vs HUT

Header iconDEFT vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts DEFT vs HUTBanner chart's image
DEFI Technologies
Price$2.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.55K
Capitalization819.08M
Hut 8
Price$35.31
Change+$2.15 (+6.48%)
Volume$2.72K
Capitalization3.5B
DEFT vs HUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DEFT vs. HUT commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEFT is a Hold and HUT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DEFT: $2.13 vs. HUT: $33.16)
Brand notoriety: DEFT and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DEFT: 222% vs. HUT: 98%
Market capitalization -- DEFT: $819.08M vs. HUT: $3.5B
DEFT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $819.08M. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DEFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DEFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DEFT is a better buy in the long-term than HUT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DEFT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DEFT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 9 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than DEFT.

Price Growth

DEFT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -15.67% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.58% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($3.5B) has a higher market cap than DEFT($819M). DEFT has higher P/E ratio than HUT: DEFT (35.76) vs HUT (23.19). HUT YTD gains are higher at: 61.835 vs. DEFT (-21.875). HUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367M vs. DEFT (24.3M). DEFT has more cash in the bank: 280M vs. HUT (216M). DEFT has less debt than HUT: DEFT (7.41M) vs HUT (362M). HUT has higher revenues than DEFT: HUT (550M) vs DEFT (-4.75M).
DEFTHUTDEFT / HUT
Capitalization819M3.5B23%
EBITDA24.3M367M7%
Gain YTD-21.87561.835-35%
P/E Ratio35.7623.19154%
Revenue-4.75M550M-1%
Total Cash280M216M130%
Total Debt7.41M362M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DEFT vs HUT: Fundamental Ratings
DEFT
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6172
SMR RATING
1..100
3154
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUT's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as DEFT (90). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

DEFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (72). This means that DEFT’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

DEFT's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (54). This means that DEFT’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as DEFT (63). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as DEFT (6). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to DEFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DEFTHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYUTX60.070.82
+1.38%
Rydex Utilities A
HFESX55.130.61
+1.12%
Janus Henderson European Focus S
FKMCX45.160.46
+1.03%
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K
MBVKX20.640.21
+1.03%
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value K
SOAVX37.450.12
+0.32%
Spirit of America Large Cap Value A

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
-4.93%
RIOT - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
+5.68%
HIVE - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
-1.68%
CIFR - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
IREN - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-9.57%
BITF - HUT
75%
Closely correlated
-5.22%
More