Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEP vs FDM
DEEP vs FDM Comparison
Open Charts DEEP vs FDM
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
Price$36.47
Change+$0.30 (+0.83%)
Volume$2.37K
Net Assets28.99M
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
Price$75.83
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
Volume$11.71K
Net Assets201.9M
DEEP vs FDM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEP vs. FDM commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEP is a StrongBuy and FDM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDM has more net assets: 202M vs. DEEP (29M). FDM has a higher annual dividend yield than DEEP: FDM (12.090) vs DEEP (6.531). DEEP was incepted earlier than FDM: DEEP (11 years) vs FDM (20 years). FDM (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than DEEP (0.80). DEEP has a higher turnover FDM (71.00) vs FDM (71.00).
| DEEP | FDM | DEEP / FDM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.531 | 12.090 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 29M | 202M | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.60 | 133% |
| Turnover | 118.00 | 71.00 | 166% |
| Yield | 2.05 | 1.32 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEP | FDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DEEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEP has been loosely correlated with ADEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEEP jumps, then ADEA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEP | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| ADEA - DEEP | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| GTX - DEEP | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| IIIN - DEEP | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| SPFI - DEEP | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| ESEA - DEEP | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
FDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDM has been closely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDM jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| SMBC - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| SHBI - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| BFST - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| OSBC - FDM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| UVSP - FDM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More | ||||