Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEP vs FDM
DEEP vs FDM Comparison
Open Charts DEEP vs FDM
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
Price$33.42
Change-$0.39 (-1.15%)
Volume$2.39K
Net Assets26.68M
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
Price$72.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
Volume$3.11K
Net Assets192.49M
DEEP vs FDM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEP vs. FDM commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEP is a Hold and FDM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDM has more net assets: 192M vs. DEEP (26.7M). FDM has a higher annual dividend yield than DEEP: FDM (7.236) vs DEEP (-2.366). DEEP was incepted earlier than FDM: DEEP (11 years) vs FDM (20 years). FDM (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than DEEP (0.80). DEEP has a higher turnover FDM (71.00) vs FDM (71.00).
| DEEP | FDM | DEEP / FDM | |
| Gain YTD | -2.366 | 7.236 | -33% |
| Net Assets | 26.7M | 192M | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.60 | 133% |
| Turnover | 118.00 | 71.00 | 166% |
| Yield | 2.26 | 1.39 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEP | FDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DEEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEP has been closely correlated with VSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DEEP jumps, then VSH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEP | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| VSH - DEEP | 74% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| PGC - DEEP | 73% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| NTB - DEEP | 67% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| LC - DEEP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| LNN - DEEP | 67% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||
FDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDM has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDM jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| BFST - FDM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| SHBI - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| AROW - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| BCML - FDM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| MCB - FDM | 76% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
More | ||||