Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEP vs FDM
DEEP vs FDM Comparison
Open Charts DEEP vs FDM
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
Price$38.53
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Volume$300
Net Assets27M
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
Volume$114
Net Assets234M
DEEP vs FDM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEP vs. FDM commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEP is a Buy and FDM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDM has more net assets: 234M vs. DEEP (27M). FDM has a higher annual dividend yield than DEEP: FDM (8.521) vs DEEP (7.637). DEEP was incepted earlier than FDM: DEEP (11 years) vs FDM (20 years). FDM (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than DEEP (0.80). DEEP has a higher turnover FDM (71.00) vs FDM (71.00).
| DEEP | FDM | DEEP / FDM | |
| Gain YTD | 7.637 | 8.521 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 27M | 234M | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.60 | 133% |
| Turnover | 140.00 | 71.00 | 197% |
| Yield | 1.68 | 1.36 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEP | FDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DEEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEP has been loosely correlated with CCSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEEP jumps, then CCSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEP | 100% | N/A | ||
| CCSI - DEEP | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| THRY - DEEP | 54% Loosely correlated | -5.74% | ||
| ADEA - DEEP | 53% Loosely correlated | -6.01% | ||
| JBI - DEEP | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.43% | ||
| OLPX - DEEP | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
More | ||||
FDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDM has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDM jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| SHBI - FDM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| OSBC - FDM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| SMBC - FDM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| BFST - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| BSRR - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||