Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEP vs FDM
DEEP vs FDM Comparison
Open Charts DEEP vs FDM
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
Price$34.76
Change-$0.11 (-0.32%)
Volume$4.78K
Net Assets26.1M
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
Price$72.73
Change-$0.22 (-0.30%)
Volume$3.22K
Net Assets196.66M
DEEP vs FDM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEP vs. FDM commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEP is a Hold and FDM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDM has more net assets: 197M vs. DEEP (26.1M). FDM has a higher annual dividend yield than DEEP: FDM (7.881) vs DEEP (1.639). DEEP was incepted earlier than FDM: DEEP (11 years) vs FDM (20 years). FDM (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than DEEP (0.80). DEEP has a higher turnover FDM (71.00) vs FDM (71.00).
| DEEP | FDM | DEEP / FDM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.639 | 7.881 | 21% |
| Net Assets | 26.1M | 197M | 13% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.60 | 133% |
| Turnover | 118.00 | 71.00 | 166% |
| Yield | 2.12 | 1.39 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEP | FDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DEEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEP has been loosely correlated with ADEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEEP jumps, then ADEA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEP | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| ADEA - DEEP | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| GTX - DEEP | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| MHO - DEEP | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| CASS - DEEP | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| PLPC - DEEP | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
FDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDM has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDM jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| SHBI - FDM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| BFST - FDM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| OSBC - FDM | 80% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| SMBC - FDM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| HTBK - FDM | 79% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||