DEEF | IEFA | DEEF / IEFA | |
Gain YTD | 25.718 | 27.624 | 93% |
Net Assets | 51.6M | 157B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.07 | 343% |
Turnover | 51.00 | 2.00 | 2,550% |
Yield | 3.40 | 2.97 | 114% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
DEEF | IEFA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago81% | 3 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago73% | 10 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 3 days ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VFLO | 37.09 | 0.12 | +0.33% |
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | |||
PFO | 9.71 | N/A | +0.02% |
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund | |||
CHW | 7.60 | -0.01 | -0.13% |
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund | |||
MCH | 28.94 | -0.24 | -0.82% |
Matthews China Active ETF | |||
HIMZ | 15.78 | -7.32 | -31.69% |
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DEEF and SEI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DEEF and SEI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DEEF | 100% | N/A | ||
SEI - DEEF | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.15% | ||
TRN - DEEF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
SAN - DEEF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
WES - DEEF | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
WPM - DEEF | 12% Poorly correlated | -7.85% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA | 100% | +0.10% | ||
ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More |