Intraday BUY SELL Signals
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEF vs HLN
DEEF vs HLN Comparison
Open Charts DEEF vs HLN
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
Price$38.40
Change+$4.04 (+11.76%)
Volume$516
Net Assets55.84M
Haleon
Price$10.49
Change+$1.47 (+16.30%)
Volume$7.82M
Capitalization46.6B
DEEF vs HLN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEF vs. HLN commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEF is a Buy and HLN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEF | HLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMOM | 36.45 | 0.55 | +1.54% |
| Cambria Global Momentum ETF | |||
| ONEV | 138.20 | 0.10 | +0.07% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® Russell 1000 LwVolFocETF | |||
| TBX | 28.03 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | |||
| JGLO | 69.01 | -0.47 | -0.68% |
| JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF | |||
| WAR | 25.48 | -0.18 | -0.70% |
| U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace and Defense ETF | |||
DEEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEF has been loosely correlated with FER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEEF jumps, then FER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEF | 100% | +1.57% | ||
| FER - DEEF | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| BAM - DEEF | 43% Loosely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| ACA - DEEF | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| CON - DEEF | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| HLN - DEEF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||
HLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLN has been loosely correlated with HLNCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLN jumps, then HLNCF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLN | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| HLNCF - HLN | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| TAK - HLN | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ZTS - HLN | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| PRGO - HLN | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
| VTRS - HLN | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||