Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEEF vs FNDF
DEEF vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts DEEF vs FNDF
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
Price$33.72
Change+$0.30 (+0.90%)
Volume$2.73K
Net Assets52.41M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$40.62
Change+$0.31 (+0.77%)
Volume$1.12M
Net Assets16.54B
DEEF vs FNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEEF vs. FNDF commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEEF is a Buy and FNDF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.5B vs. DEEF (52.4M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than DEEF: FNDF (22.975) vs DEEF (21.468). DEEF was incepted earlier than FNDF: DEEF (10 years) vs FNDF (12 years). DEEF (0.24) and FNDF (0.25) have comparable expense ratios . DEEF has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| DEEF | FNDF | DEEF / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 21.468 | 22.975 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 52.4M | 16.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.25 | 96% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 12.00 | 425% |
| Yield | 3.58 | 3.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEEF | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DEEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEEF has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEEF jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALC - DEEF | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| FER - DEEF | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| BAM - DEEF | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| ACA - DEEF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| WDS - DEEF | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with BNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then BNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| BMO - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| RY - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||