Advertisement
DECK vs JL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DECK is a Hold and JL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DECK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DECK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DECK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DECK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- JL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DECK (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while JL (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -1.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +5.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
DECK is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wholesale Distributors (+5.39% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
@Apparel/Footwear (+5.01% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| DECK | JL | DECK / JL | |
| Capitalization | 15.3B | 21.8M | 70,183% |
| EBITDA | 1.35B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -49.303 | 58.470 | -84% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.82 | 7.25 | 218% |
| Revenue | 5.13B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.72B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 312M | 2.13M | 14,682% |
DECK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DECK | JL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 13 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EFAX | 48.69 | 0.24 | +0.49% |
| SPDR® MSCI EAFE Fssl Ful Free RsrvETF | |||
| FTSL | 46.08 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Senior Loan ETF | |||
| LDRT | 25.22 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF | |||
| FYEE | 27.26 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | |||
| SLVO | 84.63 | -0.19 | -0.22% |
| UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered CallETN | |||
DECK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DECK has been loosely correlated with ONON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DECK jumps, then ONON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DECK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DECK | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| ONON - DECK | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| WWW - DECK | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| SHOO - DECK | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BIRK - DECK | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| KTB - DECK | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||
JL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JL and RCKY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JL and RCKY's prices will move in lockstep.