Advertisement
DECK vs HART
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DECK is a Hold and HART is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DECK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- DECK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DECK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- DECK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DECK (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +0.18% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
DECK is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear (+0.47% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
DECK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DECK | HART | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 15 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
DECK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DECK has been loosely correlated with ONON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DECK jumps, then ONON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DECK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DECK | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| ONON - DECK | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| WWW - DECK | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CROX - DECK | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| SHOO - DECK | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| KTB - DECK | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
More | ||||
HART and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HART has been loosely correlated with HAYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HART jumps, then HAYW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HART | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HART | 100% | N/A | ||
| HAYW - HART | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ONON - HART | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| COLM - HART | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| IRTC - HART | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| DECK - HART | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||