DECK
Price
$100.64
Change
-$1.04 (-1.02%)
Updated
Aug 11, 01:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.08B
73 days until earnings call
FOSL
Price
$1.76
Change
+$0.09 (+5.39%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
89.57M
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DECK vs FOSL

Header iconDECK vs FOSL Comparison
Open Charts DECK vs FOSLBanner chart's image
Deckers Outdoor
Price$100.64
Change-$1.04 (-1.02%)
Volume$200
Capitalization15.08B
Fossil Group
Price$1.76
Change+$0.09 (+5.39%)
Volume$2.27K
Capitalization89.57M
DECK vs FOSL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DECK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DECK vs. FOSL commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DECK is a StrongBuy and FOSL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (DECK: $101.68 vs. FOSL: $1.67)
Brand notoriety: DECK and FOSL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DECK: 64% vs. FOSL: 103%
Market capitalization -- DECK: $15.08B vs. FOSL: $89.57M
DECK [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $15.08B. FOSL’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $89.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $109.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DECK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFOSL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DECK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FOSL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DECK is a better buy in the long-term than FOSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DECK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOSL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DECK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FOSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOSL is a better buy in the short-term than DECK.

Price Growth

DECK (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while FOSL (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +5.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

DECK is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FOSL is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (-0.54% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DECK($15.1B) has a higher market cap than FOSL($89.6M). FOSL YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. DECK (-49.934). DECK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.35B vs. FOSL (-68.8M). DECK has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. FOSL (78.3M). DECK (312M) and FOSL (322M) have identical debt. DECK has higher revenues than FOSL: DECK (5.13B) vs FOSL (1.12B).
DECKFOSLDECK / FOSL
Capitalization15.1B89.6M16,853%
EBITDA1.35B-68.8M-1,964%
Gain YTD-49.9340.000-
P/E Ratio15.62N/A-
Revenue5.13B1.12B456%
Total Cash1.72B78.3M2,197%
Total Debt312M322M97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DECK vs FOSL: Fundamental Ratings
DECK
FOSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
2197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DECK's Valuation (78) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as FOSL (84) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that DECK’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

DECK's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that DECK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

DECK's SMR Rating (21) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOSL (97) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that DECK’s stock grew significantly faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

FOSL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DECK (84) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that FOSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than DECK’s over the last 12 months.

DECK's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that DECK’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DECKFOSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DECK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLTY34.270.24
+0.71%
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
SIXO33.530.06
+0.18%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Apr/Oct ETF
CSNR26.92N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF
LEMB40.54-0.03
-0.07%
iShares JP Morgan EM Local Ccy Bd ETF
DTRE39.03-0.21
-0.55%
First Trust Alerian Dsrupt Tech RE ETF

DECK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DECK has been loosely correlated with ONON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DECK jumps, then ONON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DECK
1D Price
Change %
DECK100%
-0.21%
ONON - DECK
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
WWW - DECK
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SHOO - DECK
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
BIRK - DECK
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
KTB - DECK
49%
Loosely correlated
+5.64%
More

FOSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOSL
1D Price
Change %
FOSL100%
-2.34%
MOV - FOSL
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DBI - FOSL
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
SHOO - FOSL
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
SKX - FOSL
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
DECK - FOSL
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
More