Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDWM vs FNDF
DDWM vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts DDWM vs FNDF
WisdomTree Dynamic International Eq ETF
Price$41.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$69.87K
Net Assets800.92M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$42.20
Change+$0.17 (+0.40%)
Volume$1.68M
Net Assets17.37B
DDWM vs FNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDWM vs. FNDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDWM is a Hold and FNDF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 17.4B vs. DDWM (801M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than DDWM: FNDF (27.758) vs DDWM (22.471). DDWM was incepted earlier than FNDF: DDWM (10 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than DDWM (0.40). DDWM has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| DDWM | FNDF | DDWM / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 22.471 | 27.758 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 801M | 17.4B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.25 | 160% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 12.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 2.81 | 2.92 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDWM | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDWM has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DDWM jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDWM | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| ING - DDWM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| SAN - DDWM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| BN - DDWM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BBVA - DDWM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| NWG - DDWM | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MT - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BBVA - FNDF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| MFC - FNDF | 66% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||