DDOG
Price
$138.04
Change
-$3.19 (-2.26%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
48.41B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DT
Price
$43.75
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.19B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DDOG vs DT

Header iconDDOG vs DT Comparison
Open Charts DDOG vs DTBanner chart's image
Datadog
Price$138.04
Change-$3.19 (-2.26%)
Volume$2.01M
Capitalization48.41B
Dynatrace
Price$43.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$1.04M
Capitalization13.19B
DDOG vs DT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDOG vs. DT commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDOG is a Hold and DT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DDOG: $138.04 vs. DT: $43.75)
Brand notoriety: DDOG: Notable vs. DT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDOG: 46% vs. DT: 30%
Market capitalization -- DDOG: $48.41B vs. DT: $13.19B
DDOG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $48.41B. DT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $13.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $285.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDOG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DDOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DDOG and DT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDOG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDOG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DT is a better buy in the short-term than DDOG.

Price Growth

DDOG (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while DT (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

DDOG is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

DT is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.39% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDOG($48.4B) has a higher market cap than DT($13.2B). DDOG has higher P/E ratio than DT: DDOG (445.29) vs DT (26.20). DDOG YTD gains are higher at: -3.394 vs. DT (-19.503). DT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 258M vs. DDOG (191M). DDOG has more cash in the bank: 4.14B vs. DT (1.32B). DT has less debt than DDOG: DT (86.8M) vs DDOG (1.28B). DDOG has higher revenues than DT: DDOG (3.21B) vs DT (1.85B).
DDOGDTDDOG / DT
Capitalization48.4B13.2B367%
EBITDA191M258M74%
Gain YTD-3.394-19.50317%
P/E Ratio445.2926.201,700%
Revenue3.21B1.85B173%
Total Cash4.14B1.32B315%
Total Debt1.28B86.8M1,474%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DDOG vs DT: Fundamental Ratings
DDOG
DT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5673
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7790
SMR RATING
1..100
8745
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DT's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as DDOG (93). This means that DT’s stock grew similarly to DDOG’s over the last 12 months.

DDOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as DT (90). This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.

DT's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDOG (87). This means that DT’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDOG’s over the last 12 months.

DDOG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as DT (63). This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to DT’s over the last 12 months.

DDOG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DT (99). This means that DDOG’s stock grew significantly faster than DT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDOGDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DDOG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCTR33.330.23
+0.68%
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
PY53.070.27
+0.51%
Principal Value ETF
MIG21.700.08
+0.35%
VanEck IG Corporate ETF
KCE153.090.33
+0.21%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Cap Mkts ETF
FXI38.550.02
+0.05%
iShares China Large-Cap ETF

DDOG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDOG has been loosely correlated with DT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDOG jumps, then DT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDOG
1D Price
Change %
DDOG100%
-2.26%
DT - DDOG
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
COIN - DDOG
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
FSLY - DDOG
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
CLSK - DDOG
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
CRWD - DDOG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

DT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DT has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DT jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DT
1D Price
Change %
DT100%
+0.02%
CRM - DT
69%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
TEAM - DT
68%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
FRSH - DT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
NOW - DT
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
HUBS - DT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More