DDLS | ISVL | DDLS / ISVL | |
Gain YTD | 21.048 | 29.918 | 70% |
Net Assets | 432M | 39.3M | 1,099% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.30 | 160% |
Turnover | 37.00 | 63.00 | 59% |
Yield | 3.83 | 3.36 | 114% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
DDLS | ISVL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago86% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago73% | 18 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with BEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then BEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DDLS | 100% | +0.11% | ||
BEN - DDLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
HMC - DDLS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
NWG - DDLS | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
APH - DDLS | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
STM - DDLS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and ALM have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and ALM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ISVL | 100% | +0.23% | ||
ALM - ISVL | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.88% | ||
CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
SON - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
LAND - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
PETS - ISVL | 13% Poorly correlated | -4.52% | ||
More |