DDLS | ISVL | DDLS / ISVL | |
Gain YTD | 22.525 | 31.585 | 71% |
Net Assets | 433M | 48.6M | 891% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.31 | 155% |
Turnover | 37.00 | 63.00 | 59% |
Yield | 3.67 | 3.18 | 116% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
DDLS | ISVL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago72% | 6 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 5 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with BEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then BEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DDLS | 100% | +0.31% | ||
BEN - DDLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
HMC - DDLS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
NWG - DDLS | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
APH - DDLS | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
STM - DDLS | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and ALM have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and ALM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ISVL | 100% | +0.60% | ||
ALM - ISVL | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
LAND - ISVL | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
SON - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
K - ISVL | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
More |