Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDLS vs FYLD
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FYLD
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
Price$39.91
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
Volume$14.61K
Net Assets428.12M
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$29.59
Change+$0.17 (+0.58%)
Volume$30.52K
Net Assets401.34M
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FYLD commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a Hold and FYLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDLS has more net assets: 428M vs. FYLD (401M). FYLD has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FYLD (19.373) vs DDLS (16.706). DDLS was incepted earlier than FYLD: DDLS (10 years) vs FYLD (12 years). DDLS (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover DDLS (37.00) vs DDLS (37.00).
| DDLS | FYLD | DDLS / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 16.706 | 19.373 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 428M | 401M | 107% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.59 | 81% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 44.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 3.90 | 3.06 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with VNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then VNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| VNT - DDLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| GEN - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| KEYS - DDLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| DOW - DDLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BEN - DDLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 70% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| RIO - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| CVE - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| APAM - FYLD | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||