Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDLS vs FYLD
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FYLD
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
Price$43.06
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
Volume$6.36K
Net Assets431.39M
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$32.56
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
Volume$16.87K
Net Assets487.8M
DDLS vs FYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FYLD commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a StrongBuy and FYLD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYLD has more net assets: 488M vs. DDLS (431M). FYLD has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FYLD (33.053) vs DDLS (27.205). DDLS was incepted earlier than FYLD: DDLS (10 years) vs FYLD (12 years). DDLS (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover DDLS (43.00) vs DDLS (43.00).
| DDLS | FYLD | DDLS / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 27.205 | 33.053 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 431M | 488M | 88% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.59 | 81% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 52.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 3.98 | 4.02 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| MT - DDLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| DOV - DDLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| HMC - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| GEN - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CE - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| TTE - FYLD | 69% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CNQ - FYLD | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||