Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDLS vs FNDC
DDLS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts DDLS vs FNDC
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
Price$38.89
Change-$0.22 (-0.56%)
Volume$30.87K
Net Assets427.96M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$40.88
Change-$0.47 (-1.14%)
Volume$100.7K
Net Assets2.87B
DDLS vs FNDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDLS vs. FNDC commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDLS is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.87B vs. DDLS (428M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than DDLS: FNDC (19.742) vs DDLS (11.561). DDLS was incepted earlier than FNDC: DDLS (9 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than DDLS (0.48). DDLS has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| DDLS | FNDC | DDLS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 11.561 | 19.742 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 428M | 2.87B | 15% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.39 | 123% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 33.00 | 112% |
| Yield | 3.43 | 3.05 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DDLS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 73% | 25 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDLS has been loosely correlated with VNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDLS jumps, then VNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDLS | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| VNT - DDLS | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| GEN - DDLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| DOW - DDLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| KEYS - DDLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| BEN - DDLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 71% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| BEN - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| BIPC - FNDC | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
More | ||||