DDL
Price
$4.08
Change
+$0.09 (+2.26%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
57 days until earnings call
PSBAF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.02 (-10.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

DDL vs PSBAF

Header iconDDL vs PSBAF Comparison
Open Charts DDL vs PSBAFBanner chart's image
Dingdong (Cayman)
Price$4.08
Change+$0.09 (+2.26%)
Volume$604.16K
CapitalizationN/A
PT Sumber Alfaria Trijaya TBK
Price$0.18
Change-$0.02 (-10.00%)
Volume$10.15K
CapitalizationN/A
DDL vs PSBAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDL vs. PSBAF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDL is a Hold and PSBAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (DDL: $4.08 vs. PSBAF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: DDL and PSBAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDL: 47% vs. PSBAF: 140%
Market capitalization -- DDL: $263.92M vs. PSBAF: $3.14B
DDL [@Food Retail] is valued at $263.92M. PSBAF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $3.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $41.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSBAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DDL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSBAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DDL and PSBAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DDL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

DDL (@Food Retail) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while PSBAF (@Food Retail) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

DDL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-1.78% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSBAF($3.14B) has a higher market cap than DDL($264M). DDL YTD gains are higher at: 172.000 vs. PSBAF (-5.263). PSBAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.15T vs. DDL (-233.19M). PSBAF has more cash in the bank: 2.77T vs. DDL (5.63B). DDL has less debt than PSBAF: DDL (4.87B) vs PSBAF (3.82T). PSBAF has higher revenues than DDL: PSBAF (79.78T) vs DDL (23.8B).
DDLPSBAFDDL / PSBAF
Capitalization264M3.14B8%
EBITDA-233.19M5.15T-0%
Gain YTD172.000-5.263-3,268%
P/E RatioN/A54.35-
Revenue23.8B79.78T0%
Total Cash5.63B2.77T0%
Total Debt4.87B3.82T0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

DDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDL and MSS have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDL and MSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDL
1D Price
Change %
DDL100%
+2.26%
MSS - DDL
16%
Poorly correlated
+10.28%
NGVC - DDL
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
SFM - DDL
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
ASAI - DDL
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.77%
VLGEA - DDL
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More

PSBAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSBAF and NGVC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSBAF and NGVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSBAF
1D Price
Change %
PSBAF100%
-10.00%
NGVC - PSBAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
DNOPF - PSBAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNUT - PSBAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
MSS - PSBAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+10.28%
DDL - PSBAF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%