Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDDCX vs FSMDX
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts DDDCX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.47
Change+$0.20 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
DDDCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DDDCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Feb 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDDCX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. DDDCX (95.3M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than DDDCX: FSMDX (1.07) vs DDDCX (0.00). DDDCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: DDDCX (13 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). DDDCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). DDDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DDDCX: FSMDX (0) vs DDDCX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. DDDCX (-9.43). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.39 vs. DDDCX (-30.02).
| DDDCX | FSMDX | DDDCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.03 | 10,040% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.785 | 3.628 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 46.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.43 | 10.09 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.06 | 39.47 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.02 | 43.39 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.33 | 186.93 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement