It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DDD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNNDM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DDD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNDM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
DDD (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -3.92% price change this week, while NNDM (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -0.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.87%.
DDD is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
NNDM is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
DDD | NNDM | DDD / NNDM | |
Capitalization | 593M | 617M | 96% |
EBITDA | -55.51M | -48.58M | 114% |
Gain YTD | -45.984 | -10.000 | 460% |
P/E Ratio | 5.14 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 506M | 56.3M | 899% |
Total Cash | 446M | 852M | 52% |
Total Debt | 533M | 13.8M | 3,862% |
DDD | NNDM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NNDM's Valuation (35) in the Textiles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDD (78) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NNDM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDD’s over the last 12 months.
NNDM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as DDD (100) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NNDM’s stock grew similarly to DDD’s over the last 12 months.
NNDM's SMR Rating (91) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as DDD (93) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that NNDM’s stock grew similarly to DDD’s over the last 12 months.
DDD's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NNDM (62) in the Textiles industry. This means that DDD’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
DDD's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as NNDM (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that DDD’s stock grew similarly to NNDM’s over the last 12 months.
DDD | NNDM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago86% | 9 days ago0% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDD has been loosely correlated with SSYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDD jumps, then SSYS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DDD | 100% | +0.88% | ||
SSYS - DDD | 58% Loosely correlated | +20.50% | ||
CRSR - DDD | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
NNDM - DDD | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
IONQ - DDD | 34% Loosely correlated | +16.30% | ||
STX - DDD | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNDM has been loosely correlated with SSYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNDM jumps, then SSYS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NNDM | 100% | +2.86% | ||
SSYS - NNDM | 43% Loosely correlated | +20.50% | ||
DDD - NNDM | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
DM - NNDM | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.24% | ||
RGTI - NNDM | 35% Loosely correlated | +14.09% | ||
CRSR - NNDM | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
More |