DDCCF
Price
$2.30
Change
+$0.20 (+9.52%)
Updated
Jan 6 closing price
Capitalization
183.87M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVAUF
Price
$3.74
Change
-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DDCCF vs SVAUF

Header iconDDCCF vs SVAUF Comparison
Open Charts DDCCF vs SVAUFBanner chart's image
BRANICKS GROUP AG
Price$2.30
Change+$0.20 (+9.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization183.87M
Storagevault Canada
Price$3.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Volume$55.4K
Capitalization1.36B
DDCCF vs SVAUF Comparison Chart in %
DDCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVAUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDCCF vs. SVAUF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDCCF is a Hold and SVAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (DDCCF: $2.30 vs. SVAUF: $3.74)
Brand notoriety: DDCCF and SVAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDCCF: 7% vs. SVAUF: 262%
Market capitalization -- DDCCF: $183.87M vs. SVAUF: $1.36B
DDCCF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $183.87M. SVAUF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DDCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVAUF is a better buy in the long-term than DDCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDCCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVAUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SVAUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVAUF is a better buy in the short-term than DDCCF.

Price Growth

DDCCF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVAUF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +4.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.30% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVAUF($1.37B) has a higher market cap than DDCCF($184M). SVAUF (9.677) and DDCCF (9.524) have similar YTD gains . SVAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 202M vs. DDCCF (144M). DDCCF has more cash in the bank: 97.1M vs. SVAUF (24.8M). DDCCF has less debt than SVAUF: DDCCF (1.84B) vs SVAUF (2.26B). SVAUF has higher revenues than DDCCF: SVAUF (329M) vs DDCCF (220M).
DDCCFSVAUFDDCCF / SVAUF
Capitalization184M1.37B13%
EBITDA144M202M71%
Gain YTD9.5249.67798%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue220M329M67%
Total Cash97.1M24.8M392%
Total Debt1.84B2.26B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVAUF: Fundamental Ratings
SVAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDCCFSVAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
39%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DDCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVAUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEIIX12.62-0.04
-0.32%
Hennessy Equity and Income Institutional
EADIX20.37-0.07
-0.34%
Eaton Vance Global Equity Income A
RDEGX14.46-0.06
-0.41%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R2E
STCZX18.61-0.08
-0.43%
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
PBCKX42.16-0.41
-0.96%
Principal Blue Chip Institutional

DDCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDCCF and SVAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDCCF and SVAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDCCF
1D Price
Change %
DDCCF100%
N/A
SVAUF - DDCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLPPY - DDCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
CLLNY - DDCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
OPEN - DDCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
NYC - DDCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.49%
More

SVAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVAUF and AANNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVAUF and AANNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVAUF
1D Price
Change %
SVAUF100%
-0.27%
AANNF - SVAUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VONOY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
DTCWY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JLL - SVAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
OPEN - SVAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.56%
More