DDCCF
Price
$2.13
Change
-$0.26 (-10.88%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
416.87M
SIOLY
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
458.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DDCCF vs SIOLY

Header iconDDCCF vs SIOLY Comparison
Open Charts DDCCF vs SIOLYBanner chart's image
BRANICKS GROUP AG
Price$2.13
Change-$0.26 (-10.88%)
Volume$21K
Capitalization416.87M
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$234
Capitalization458.79M
DDCCF vs SIOLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DDCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIOLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDCCF vs. SIOLY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDCCF is a Hold and SIOLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DDCCF: $2.13 vs. SIOLY: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: DDCCF and SIOLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDCCF: 349% vs. SIOLY: 1%
Market capitalization -- DDCCF: $416.87M vs. SIOLY: $458.79M
DDCCF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $416.87M. SIOLY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $458.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIOLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DDCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIOLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIOLY is a better buy in the long-term than DDCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDCCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIOLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SIOLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DDCCF and SIOLY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DDCCF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIOLY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIOLY($459M) has a higher market cap than DDCCF($417M). DDCCF has higher P/E ratio than SIOLY: DDCCF (16.89) vs SIOLY (9.36). DDCCF YTD gains are higher at: -2.740 vs. SIOLY (-62.500). SIOLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.2B vs. DDCCF (220M). SIOLY has more cash in the bank: 15.4B vs. DDCCF (498M). DDCCF has less debt than SIOLY: DDCCF (3.26B) vs SIOLY (95.2B). SIOLY has higher revenues than DDCCF: SIOLY (67.1B) vs DDCCF (237M).
DDCCFSIOLYDDCCF / SIOLY
Capitalization417M459M91%
EBITDA220M10.2B2%
Gain YTD-2.740-62.5004%
P/E Ratio16.899.36180%
Revenue237M67.1B0%
Total Cash498M15.4B3%
Total Debt3.26B95.2B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SIOLY: Fundamental Ratings
SIOLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDCCFSIOLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DDCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIOLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTAGX15.120.19
+1.27%
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
LADVX29.800.35
+1.19%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R6
VNVCX21.600.16
+0.75%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap C
DHLYX34.050.17
+0.50%
Diamond Hill Large Cap Y
TMMAX18.220.07
+0.39%
SEI Tax-Managed Mgd Volatility F (SIMT)

DDCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDCCF and KOJAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDCCF and KOJAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDCCF
1D Price
Change %
DDCCF100%
N/A
KOJAF - DDCCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBJF - DDCCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRPTF - DDCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
AEI - DDCCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-6.58%
SIOLY - DDCCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
More

SIOLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIOLY has been loosely correlated with HLPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIOLY jumps, then HLPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIOLY
1D Price
Change %
SIOLY100%
-1.96%
HLPPF - SIOLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SOLLY - SIOLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHVKY - SIOLY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHVKF - SIOLY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YUPRF - SIOLY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More