DDCCF
Price
$2.32
Change
-$0.04 (-1.69%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
186.73M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLPPY
Price
$5.96
Change
+$0.29 (+5.11%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DDCCF vs HLPPY

Header iconDDCCF vs HLPPY Comparison
Open Charts DDCCF vs HLPPYBanner chart's image
BRANICKS GROUP AG
Price$2.32
Change-$0.04 (-1.69%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization186.73M
Hang Lung Properties
Price$5.96
Change+$0.29 (+5.11%)
Volume$2.28K
Capitalization6.04B
DDCCF vs HLPPY Comparison Chart in %
DDCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLPPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDCCF vs. HLPPY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDCCF is a Buy and HLPPY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (DDCCF: $2.36 vs. HLPPY: $5.97)
Brand notoriety: DDCCF and HLPPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDCCF: 278% vs. HLPPY: 15%
Market capitalization -- DDCCF: $186.73M vs. HLPPY: $6.04B
DDCCF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $186.73M. HLPPY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $6.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLPPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DDCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLPPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLPPY is a better buy in the long-term than DDCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDCCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLPPY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLPPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLPPY is a better buy in the short-term than DDCCF.

Price Growth

DDCCF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +5.84% price change this week, while HLPPY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.06% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLPPY($6.04B) has a higher market cap than DDCCF($187M). DDCCF YTD gains are higher at: 12.143 vs. HLPPY (7.866). HLPPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5B vs. DDCCF (144M). HLPPY has higher revenues than DDCCF: HLPPY (11.2B) vs DDCCF (220M).
DDCCFHLPPYDDCCF / HLPPY
Capitalization187M6.04B3%
EBITDA144M5B3%
Gain YTD12.1437.866154%
P/E RatioN/A25.19-
Revenue220M11.2B2%
Total Cash97.1MN/A-
Total Debt1.84BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLPPY: Fundamental Ratings
HLPPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDCCFHLPPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DDCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLPPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAAQX13.720.22
+1.63%
DWS RREEF Real Assets R
GMCUX17.620.07
+0.40%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity R6
JGYIX13.160.05
+0.38%
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield I
HULEX36.07N/A
N/A
Huber Select Large Cap Value Instl
RNPGX71.83-0.90
-1.24%
American Funds New Perspective R6

DDCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDCCF and SVAUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDCCF and SVAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDCCF
1D Price
Change %
DDCCF100%
N/A
SVAUF - DDCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
HLPPY - DDCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
CLLNY - DDCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
OPEN - DDCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
NYC - DDCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.58%
More

HLPPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLPPY has been loosely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLPPY jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLPPY
1D Price
Change %
HLPPY100%
+0.34%
BEKE - HLPPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
HYSNY - HLPPY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUO - HLPPY
33%
Poorly correlated
-11.54%
HLPPF - HLPPY
31%
Poorly correlated
+10.36%
VNNVF - HLPPY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More