Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DCZRX vs NAESX
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DCZRX vs NAESX
Macquarie Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.17
Change+$0.26 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.35B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
DCZRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DCZRX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DCZRX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. DCZRX (7.35B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DCZRX: NAESX (1.28) vs DCZRX (0.73). DCZRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DCZRX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). DCZRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). DCZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). DCZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: DCZRX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. DCZRX (8.83). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. DCZRX (47.35).
| DCZRX | NAESX | DCZRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.822 | 1.432 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.35B | 148B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.28 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.83 | 12.22 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.64 | 37.83 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.35 | 69.32 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers